June 12, 2009 at 05:16 (Uncategorized)
Literacy is an evolving process from the beginning of a life, consisting of all empirical data combined. At the First Grade level there will be variance in ability dependent on their individual pasts. The first step is assessing this ability in each student for both reading and writing. Kindergarten tips the iceberg of learning sight-words. First Grade delves deeper into this. By this point they should be past the scribbling stage and well into association of graphemes to phonemes. Even some may be familiar with more complex digraphs. Along with other literacy lessons like reading stories, pointing out the author and illustrator to give deeper understanding that all text represents words and ideas, reading to each other, and pre-reading with picture analysis there is a year long project lesson that I hold complete enamor. I only wish I could remember the name of the book that it was in. If anyone knows, please comment and I will post a link. This lesson succinctly ties in multiple literacy lessons and assessments with personal experience. During the course of the year they will complete an entire book with words and illustrations of their own story using the technique of scaffolding.
This may sound a bit daunting, but it is actual for any level of learning from Pre-K to Highschool and beyond with the right modifications. At the First Grade level we begin by taking turns telling a story vocally to the group. The teacher always begins with an example. Afterward, comprehension levels are checked with a discussion, question, and answer session. This is also a good way to implement Higher Order thought by asking for more background on the story. Being mostly in the Pre-operational stage and moving into Concrete Operations, a single page colored drawing with words describing a significant piece of the events depicted in the story is presented. Madeline Hunter, another educational theorist, uses a hook to get the student interested in the assignment. In this case that hook or anticipatory set would be the question, “How many of you would like to do something like this?” The initial assignment would be to think of a story to tell the class the next time it is met. Some student would also get a chance to tell theirs only to cement the idea into the other students heads that this was something they could all do.
At the next meeting the teacher retells the story adding a few details. Children are invited to tell their story with the same audience participation process the teacher went through. At roughly half time the teacher presents another drawing. This time it is a simple sketch of another piece of the action either before or after the previous. This is the beginning stages of teaching sequencing. That sketch is talked about briefly and the class is split into two groups – those who have told a story and those who have not. The storytellers begin working on their own rough sketch. Those who have not gone are put into pairs to share their stories with the other. They are encouraged to facilitate the same process of discussion. The following days this is repeated until all stories have been told to the class entire.
The lesson continues throughout the year always growing and building upon the last, which is the basis for scaffolding. Rather than exploring each lesson in depth, I will give a brief overview. The stories are told, the initial drawings are created, writing begins. They are asked, “What is happening here?” Sometimes the teacher will write a word for them or a sentence. Other times they will supply their own. Important elements of the drawing are discovered with text. Characters and objects are labeled. Verbs and adjectives are placed. Finally, sentences evolve with the addition of sight words to link them into sentences. None of the structures need complete accuracy at first. This will also evolve with constant guiding and assessment on the part of the teacher. When one drawing is finished, the next is begun with sequencing questions like, “What happened before / after / or in between?” Descriptive questions are asked to fill out the artwork and add more text like, “Who is this? What is this? Why are they doing this?” Cause and effect questions are also discovered, “Why did this happen?” These are repeatedly shared with the class, with pairs, and with the teacher constantly questioning the motives.
During the process it is also important to tie in other lessons that relate. Where can vocabulary words be included in the story? How can Math be applied to this situation? What is the Science behind a piece of your story? I am a firm believer in the integration of studies. The more we point out the mingling of all subjects in life, the better. Most of this project is an informal assessment of their literacy. It will give an idea of what stage of writing they are involved. A child might write “LFNT” next to the big gray blob at the zoo. We know the child recognizes the phonemic relationship between those letters and the word “elephant”. Another child might have included vowels in any variety of combination or left out the ‘n.’ This gives us their range and the ability to assist them into the next realm at their own pace.
The physical end result is a book of an undesignated amount of pages. It is bound with construction paper, has a title, author, and illustrator. They are presented to the parents in an open house and displayed lovingly around the classroom. The mental result is the knowledge of sequencing, cause and effect, description, the letter-word-sentence combinations, the types of words, the importance of words, the recognition and placement of site words, comprehension, memory, and personal association of words to their life. I believe personal life experience is the most valuable learning tool.
List of materials – unlined paper, construction paper, pencil, colored pencils, crayons, markers, hole puncher, ribbon. More supplies can be added or substituted as the instructor sees fit to modify the lesson into larger art projects – glue, fabric pieces, scissors, recycled materials, etc.
Leave a Comment
June 12, 2009 at 04:50 (Uncategorized)
Tags: arrangement, authority, before, between, character, class size, classroom design, classroom management, during, education, effective instruction, elementary school, excitement, exit, expectations, flow, fred jones, free, friendly, goodbye, greeting, hello, higher order thinking, initial, instruction, knowledge, layout, learning, learning environment, learning process, lesson, materials, norms, participation, place of learning, planning, positive, protocol, respect, routine, rules, safe, schedule, stage, structure, style, teacher, teacher stress, visible
The first day of class is significantly important in providing a safe and respectful learning environment. Typically, classroom protocol is explained and demonstrated again and again from before they enter to the moment they leave. There are five stages to this process : The Before, The Initial, The During, The Exit, and The Between.
Before a single child arrives the stage should be properly set. According to Fred Jones, a published educator on classroom management, room design can play an integral part of classroom management and alleviating unnecessary teacher stress. The desks should be arranged to fit the teaching style, the lesson, and the class size. The teacher never wants to be too far from any child location in the room that they cannot take a few steps toward and potential social problems should be resituated. Another key ingredient to the Before stage is having clear information of the entire day planned visibly on the board. People respond to a certain amount of structure to let them know the lesson is not an off the cuff fly by night; however, they also appreciate a loose enough ability to move comfortably into other realms of learning within that structure.
When the children arrive they have a known routine performance to get them into the character of a student. My routine for them would consist of this : put your stuff down, get your materials ready, and begin quietly working on an assignment until class begins. Usually, I meet them at the door for a quick hello and to relay any amendments or additions to that routine. This routine is also clearly visible but separate from the day schedule. Any changes to that routine is notated in the Before stage. From the moment they walk into the classroom they are working. This establishes that it is a place of learning. The greeting at the door establishes that it is also a friendly and safe place. In the elementary school age of development children have the desire to please authority figures and emulate them. Obviously, on day one they would not be familiar with the routine, but it is still important to have the same expectations of them to designate this time for these things.
During class we practice our classroom norms. On the first day we discuss these norms and come to an agreement as a group what they would be. My most significant rule is “respect.” Any other guidelines usually fall into this category. The discussion for the first part of the day would be defining respect and refining ways that we can be respectful. The students would give examples of times they were respectful or times when they were respected. These would all be led by story examples from the teacher. To illustrate that it was a two way street and also to exercise higher order thinking skills, we would discuss how the teacher could be respectful to them. Finally, we would write down the five major ways to respect each other with a positive spin instead of a negative. For example – instead of “no hitting” we would say “we keep our hands to ourselves.” Before any lesson throughout the year we would point out a couple ways to be respectful during it. I do a 1:3:1 ratio with these. One from me as an example, three from them, and the last from me to catch anything they might have missed.
Upon exiting it is important to leave them with something to look forward to for next time, something to think about from today, and a final friendly goodbye. These are as important as anything else done throughout the day. I feel a teacher’s job is to make the students excited about learning. If they want to be there, they will get more out of the information presented.
Finally, the Between stage occurs when all of the kids leave. All work should be graded in a timely manner and returned to them with remarks that demonstrate it was considered. These should all be positive and constructive. They should be poignant and topical. “Good Job! I like how you . . .” Stickers are always a crowd pleaser. The lesson for the next week should be planned ahead of time. The classroom should be reset for the start of the day tomorrow. And the whole process starts all over again.
Leave a Comment
March 25, 2009 at 17:59 (Uncategorized)
Tags: child, classroom, compare, contrast, crayon, difference, education, effective instruction, fact, index card, input, instruction, knowledge, lesson, lesson plan, marker, opinion, paper strip, similarities, teaching, venne diagram, video
Date: Activity: Fact or Opinion
Objective: To teach the difference between fact and opinion
Anticipatory: A Fact and Opinion Venne Diagram is on the board. Compare and Contrast the differences and similarities as a review of prior information.
Information: Fact
Opionion
Modeling: Make up 5 sentences that are either Fact or Opinion. Discuss what makes them so. Have the class make up as many sentences as they can on slips of paper that could be either fact or opinion. When everyone has at least 5, stop the activity.
Retention: Watch a short video. Instruct them to pay attention to the facts and opinions in it. Have the class write down as many facts and opinions that interest them. When the film is over they can write more. Review some of them
Activity: Have them make cards with an “F” for “fact” and an “O” for “opinion”. Divide them into teams. One person from each team comes to the podium, Read a strip of paper they made. (Make sure to fudge them into correct before you read them). They lay their cards down onto a specific spot, no bigger than the card. Mark this with tape on the podium. The team with the bottom card marking the correct answer wins the point.
Modification:
Enhancement:
Resources: Video, index cards, markers, crayons, paper strips
Evaluation:
Leave a Comment
March 25, 2009 at 04:06 (Uncategorized)
Tags: abstract, application, assessment, brainstorming, child, chronology, classroom, comprehension, construction paper, development, education, effective instruction, event, instruction, knowledge, lesson, lesson plan, line graph, Madeline Hunter, markers, model, narrative, organization, sequencing, story, synonyms, teacher, thought, timeline, working definition
Date: Activity: Sequence of My Event
Objective: To acquire “sequencing” comprehension skills
Anticipatory: Write “sequence” on board. Ask what it means. After a few definitions guide them into giving “synonyms.” Write these on the board underneathe it. Now, ask for examples of things that can be sequenced. Write these on the board also.
Information: A working definition of what “sequence” means and how to apply it to everyday life, a story or narrative, and the brainstorming process. Create a line-graphed timeline. Use a timeline to organize details of an event.
Modeling: Draw a timeline on the board. Above it write a fictional character’s name and explain that they have a life similar to theirs. At the beginning write, “Wake,” and at the end write, “Sleep.” Put a marker in the very center of the timeline. Ask, “What happens in the very middle of their day?” Guide them to answer Lunch. This will offer a springboard of Dinner and Breakfast to get their minds working. Then start taking other suggestions to complete the timeline with at least 10 things. Make sure they know that each person’s day might be different (i.e. some people may shower after they have breakfast). Offer problems like, “Should they brush their teeth before eating?” and “Would they put their school clothes on before they shower?”
Retention: Read a short story/narrative that integrates other curriculum (i.e. social studies). Draw a new timeline on the board. Ask for a title pertaining to the story. Ask every student to think of something important that happened in the story and at what point in the timeline it falls. What happened at the beginning? What happened at the end? Go around the room with every student telling you something that happened and where it belongs on the timeline. If a student is having trouble remembering offer a suggestion. Have them tell you where it occurred.
Activity: On a double sheet of construction paper have them draw a timeline. Refer back to the examples of things that can be sequenced. Their assignment is to plot the course of anything they choose (i.e. video game, story, cartoon, TV show, day at the park, etc.)
Modification: Allow them to draw pictures on the points of the timeline. Allow for a single word description of the activity at that point.
Enhancement: Allow them to ‘make up’ a character like at the beginning of class or a story. They plot the timeline first, then write a sentence about every point on it to create a story with a beginning, middle, and end.
Resources: Construction paper, markers, story with chronological events
Evaluation:
Leave a Comment
February 18, 2009 at 15:32 (Becoming an EC-4 Teacher in Texas, Child Development, Uncategorized)
Tags: teacher, development, texas, nath, myrna cohen, human, child, level, education, authority, instruction, Becoming an EC-4 Teacher in Texas, curriculum, classroom, integrating curriculum, courtesy, interacting, communicating, administration, staff, educators, faculty, coworkers, positive relationships, gossip, team building, socializing, outside of work, confidant, teaming, horizontal teaming, vertical teaming, team teaching, integrate, specialists, paraprofessionals, multilateral teaming, inter-school dialogue, hierarchy, division of administrators, school board, teacher unions, involvement
(summary, thoughts, and review of Becoming an EC-4 Teacher in Texas by Janice L. Nath and Myrna Cohen)

Becoming an EC-4 Teacher in Texas
Chapter 18 : Interacting and Communicating with Other Educators
By David Roy
As in the last chapter, this one pertains to adequate communication. Instead of families we are talking with other educators and coworkers. There is just as much of a line one must walk when in the company of these other adults as there would be in walking with the parents. Sometimes that line is finer. With only a brief overview of negative possibilities the chapter discusses positive relationships to have with these other faculty members. As much as we would all probably like to shut the door in our classroom and teach, there will always be politics wherever you go.
In my last reflection I mentioned the policy of talking infrequently if at all about school and keeping the details very shallow when not in a school setting. This concern extends beyond just the parents. With other educators it is a good policy to follow as well. The Friday night pint after work can be great team building fun as long as people maintain courtesy toward those present and not. The whole social world is a gossip community. Make sure that that which you speak is positive. Listen, making notes to be aware of the subject and the teller. Those prone to talk in groups are prone to talk in groups without you. If you absolutely need a confidant, make it someone a) you trust and b) is not affiliated with the school. Your friends tend to fall into your profession, though. That is the whole birds of a feather idea. The book hardly mentions any of this either.
What the book does mention about talking with fellow educators is teaming. Horizontal teaming, vertical teaming, and team teaching are wonderful concepts to integrate the curriculum. Sometimes specialists and paraprofessionals get left out of the loop of core curriculum teachers, though. There is just not enough time in the week. They should be just as involved in these multilateral teamings as anyone else. I think the children and the teachers would benefit greatly from regular, improved, inter-school dialogue. What better way to integrate curriculum? I am sure this gets trickier in highschool. I do not even know exactly how or when these horizontal and vertical teaming occur.
There is also a fairly comprehensive list of the faculty hierarchy in non-hierarchy format. They list the division of administrators, the school board, and the different branches of teaching one would come across on campus. It tells us the Texas equivalence of teacher unions. It even lists other nonessential resources that might be important for the teacher sometime in their life.
I guess the overall point to make is to keep it professional, but not too cold. This will only extend the coldness of our world for more generations to come. Be warm. Be friendly. Be respectful, Understand where another is coming. Involve them and be involved with them. It makes no sense to just shut the door of your classroom and teach. There is a whole world of opportunities out there for the taking. Just make sure to give back also.
Leave a Comment
February 16, 2009 at 14:40 (Becoming an EC-4 Teacher in Texas, Child Development, Uncategorized)
Tags: administration, Becoming an EC-4 Teacher in Texas, child, comfortable, communicating, conferences, custodians, dealing with adults, education, families, family card, family education right to privacy act, FERPA, follow ups, formal approach, human, initial bond, initial verbal introduction, instruction, interacting, knowledge, legal guidelines, non-threatening, notes home, open house, ordered, parents, phone calls, prepared, productive, professionalism, representative, representative of the school, staff, teacher, teachers, texas, timely, too friendly
(summary, thoughts, and review of Becoming an EC-4 Teacher in Texas by Janice L. Nath and Myrna Cohen)

Becoming an EC-4 Teacher in Texas
Chapter 17 : Interacting and Communicating with Families
By David Roy
I always say, “Teaching is easy, it is dealing with the adults I have difficulty with.” I am well aware of my strengths and weaknesses. I figured this would be a good chapter to read. I felt it was enlightening to some extent, however, incomplete. Unlike the technology chapter, it focused on the dos rather than the do nots. I have had many various experiences working with families about their children. It is a gamble and a gambit. Even maintaining “professionalism” can be the wrong course of action to truly reach them; whereas, becoming too friendly can come back to bite you. This is the same situation with other teachers, administrative staff, and custodians.
We are all aware of the formal approach to communicating with parents. It is suggested to have a Welcome Day near the beginning of school. This is a good idea after you have learned all of the student’s names. Sending notes home, phone calls, and follow-ups are best after an initial verbal introduction has been made. As a camp director I required that my staff call the parents of their children the weekend before the first day. As a teacher I would like to adhere to a similar policy. The book did not offer any suggestions to whether this was a good idea or not. In my mind I have amended it to the first week of school. It builds a nice, non-threatening, initial bond with the families. Notes should be brief, poignant, and in accord with legal guidelines like FERPA. As much as we would like to think parents could read a book about their kids, this is not always the case. Conferences should be timely, ordered, prepared, comfortable, and productive. I got it. I hate the thought of keeping a card on a family with pertinent information for me to refer during the meeting. I understand the significance of it. I would rather have a closer relationship than an index card memory of a person, though. Unfortunately, this pushes the bounds of what “professionalism” means in a public school environment.
To be candid the thought of keeping people at an arm’s distance further than I normally would bothers me. I am a people person. I like to engage in their world on their terms as much as I like them engaging in mine. In our society this is just not done anymore. Honestly, I would rather a friend teach my child. We do not breed this environment in our current system. In a small town it is difficult not to run into the parents on a regular basis, but still frowned upon to do so. I see nothing wrong with extending those conferences to a dinner at their house; however, most school policies do not permit this for good reason. If I had a family, it is possible that I would be more inclined to reciprocate. Our world can be cold enough already to build halfhearted relationships with people you are considered an important part of their life. In some situations this approach might be just the thing to reestablish faith in the school community. It might actually reach a parent, who has been posing an obstinate problem in the past. The careful line that must be teetered is in remembering that you are always a representative of the school.
Seeing a parent in the grocery store, at a restaurant, or even out on the town teachers must always maintain an air of the aforementioned professionalism. We are after all in charge of their children for a large portion of the waking day. Even if they have a lampshade on their head does not mean we are allowed to put one on also. I have had mutual friends who were friends with parents of students. What do you do when you are brought together unsuspectingly? The book never mentions this or other situations that I question. I would place a line to talk infrequently if at all about school and keep the details very shallow but positive.
Leave a Comment
February 12, 2009 at 03:09 (Becoming an EC-4 Teacher in Texas, Child Development, Uncategorized)
Tags: accessibility, adult content, age appropriate, applications, Becoming an EC-4 Teacher in Texas, block, bully, child, classroom, copyrights, courteous, courtesy, development, digital playground, discretion, ec-4, education, effective instruction, electronic, email, fair use policy, harassment, honesty, human, information, instruction, internet, internet bullying, internet morality, knowledge, legality, machines, moral, myspace, netiquette, safety, school computers, screen name, second life, teacher, teacher application, technology, texas, user content, website, wikipedia, youtube
(summary, thoughts, and review of Becoming an EC-4 Teacher in Texas by Janice L. Nath and Myrna Cohen)

Becoming an EC-4 Teacher in Texas
Chapter 14 : Using Technology in the EC-4 Classroom
By David Roy
Being a gadget junkie it is only natural that I would have skipped ahead to the use of technology chapter for my next reflection. There is a crazy world ahead of us with the constant upgrading of machines in our society. They are becoming bigger, better, faster, more productive, and much more accessible than only the early science fiction writers had ever dreamed. In many cases we have surpassed them. Children can work laps around adults on these new tools. Our only hope of keeping up is the constant involvement of new applications in out daily routine. My only disappointment of this chapter was the amount of don’t outweighed the do.They spent lots of time discussing the copyrights and fair use policies and only a portion on the teacher application of technology.
The copyright laws, fair use, and legality segments were to be expected. With the nearly free of censorship mandate on the Internet a world of information that is not age appropriate (in many cases not appropriate for any age) floods the electronic stream. There are things we do not want our children to experience. We are responsible for where they go and what they do online. Many schools have implemented the blockage of adult content on school computers. If they have not, they should. The advent of new software has made it really easy to filter out most of it. Like with any discouragement of criminal activity the criminals get smarter and invent new ways to still commit crimes. Having the computer screens all facing the teacher seems like it would almost finish the job.
Sometimes schools take another step in filtering out the “bad” by putting a proverbial fence around any area that could possibly propose a problem. I am talking about Myspace, You Tube, Facebook, Second Life, email, and other user content websites. Since the news did a huge smear on these places, it has been taboo to confront them in the school districts. Personally, I think they are no worse than Wikipedia. All of these places have taken drastic measures to ensure that “adult” content is kept out of the hands of children if proper netiquette is observed. Rather than fencing off an area, because fences make trespassing more desirable, we should focus more on Internet morality. The first step to that is honesty. Do not lie about your age. This will keep them out of most bad spots. A screen name is not dishonesty. It is cover. Not giving information over unsecured channels is not dishonest either, which brings me to my second principle, discretion. How many people have made the mistake of going to whitehouse.com instead of .org or .gov? If you find yourself in a bad neighborhood, turn around and go back to where it is safe. If you are in a conversation that makes you uncomfortable, leave it. If you are being harassed, tell an authority. That brings us to the next netiquette principle, be courteous. The old saying, “if you would not say it to their face, do not say it,” leaves something to be desired for amendment, but it will suffice until they get older and have philosophy degrees. I think schools could benefit from using these soft taboo sites with the proper moderation and training. You Tube hosts a plethora of user created videos in the public domain that can be informative and cultural. Myspace, Facebook, and Second Life are accepted forms of socializing in our new world. All of them have kid-areas. I think schools should create accounts on these pages (set to private and heavily monitored of course) with invitations to only legal guardians, students, and teachers. All of the adults involved should be responsible for monitoring the actions of the members. How much time do you think a teenager spends on these places I have just named? Imagine if there was a way to do their homework there too? Plus, we would be training them for the networking world of the future with proper netiquette. At one time it was on the playground. It still is except the playground is digital.
Leave a Comment
February 10, 2009 at 02:26 (Becoming an EC-4 Teacher in Texas, Child Development, Uncategorized)
Tags: apathy, assessment, attitude, Becoming an EC-4 Teacher in Texas, child, Child Development, classroom, classroom environment, cultural barrier, dendrites, desire, development, education, effective instruction, energy, enthusiasm, erikson, expectation, high expectations, industry vs inferiority, initiative vs guilt, instruction, lesson plan, loudness, misguided enthusiasm, perform, self fulfilling prophecy, teacher, teacher attitude, texas, too much enthusiasm, zone of proximal development

Becoming an EC-4 Teacher in Texas
(summary, thoughts, and review of Becoming an EC-4 Teacher in Texas by Janice L. Nath and Myrna Cohen)
Chapter 7 : The Case for Teacher Enthusiasm and High Expectations
By David Roy
This chapter can easily be summed up in a single sentence. Teachers should be enthusiastic and have high expectations of their students. Of course it goes into greater detail than just that, giving us an arsenal of intelligent words to present our case. They are hardly necessary. Anyone who has ever read a book or seen a movie knows that it is much more interesting if it is presented with enthusiasm from the author or director. Anyone who has performed for a boss realizes their job usually depends upon the view that boss has of their work. Because I cannot just end here, I will summarize more in depth.
The introduction was only partially agreeable. There is something to be said for the teacher attitude in the classroom; however, there is also something to be said about the students. Not every class every year will go smoothly. This introduction puts false hope in the new teacher. Granted, much of the classroom environment depends on the teacher, but you have to admit that a portion of that environment depends on the students. Another portion depends on the student reaction to the teacher. Not all classes are conducive to every teacher. There might be too large of a cultural barrier between the teacher and the students. Sometimes that can be an opportunity for learning. Other times it can be devastating toward both. The school might see the children more, but the home will always have a greater impact. To think otherwise is pure blind conceit.
Enthusiasm goes a long way. A friend spoke about the energy in his classroom the other day. I have to admit that I was envious, as I am sure others listening were as well. The teacher models the behavior for the classroom. Having said that, a teacher can have too much enthusiasm or misguided enthusiasm. Enthusiasm without control can be loud. Loudness bothers other teachers. Even if absolute learning is taking place, this is usually frowned upon if it is excessive. My favorite is when teachers are enthusiastically trying to quiet a room. I worked in camps for too many years to think I would ever make a good classroom teacher. I like to be loud, but I have great control. I know this about myself; yet, I have amended it to fit the classroom environment. I have learned to channel my enthusiasm into new avenues that involve less noise. Was there a sacrifice? I think so. There was at least a deviation from the path. A teacher must have a high self-efficacy, idea of success. This factor alone has made up for my loss in enthusiasm. I had to say, “I can do this” and I did.
Once again Nath throws in some portion of the chapter that does not fit. She reiterates the stages of child development according to Erikson. She tells us again about initiative versus guilt and industry versus inferiority. This has nothing to do with enthusiasm. It does help build dendrites, though.
Without high expectations a teacher will be creating a self-fulfilling prophecy. People think only Nostradomus and John are capable of this. They are not. We are too. If you think they will fail, they probably will. My best friend’s little brother has this problem. We call it IDS, or Imminent Death Syndrome, after a comedy sketch by David Cross and Bob Odenkirk. Because he has been about to die his whole life, there has been a certain amount of sympathy and acceptance of his actions with the awareness that death looms around the corner. Initially, as a child, maybe it helped him achieve what no doctor thought possible, but the long range effect is apathy, “Well, I am going to die soon anyway” attitude. He has had open-heart surgery more times than I can count. He was never supposed to crawl, much less walk. Talking was supposed to be next to impossible, but he passed high school. He did the work. They just did not build his zone of proximal development. He is content to sit on a couch watching television, working a couple hours a week, and waiting to die. It is difficult to say whether the expectations were high or not.
Then, we have the teenager who puts a gun in his mouth rather than graduate valedictorian, all star athlete, homecoming king, and class president. Were the expectations unrealistically too high? Was the desire for these things not as great as others desires for him to achieve them? Or was it because he made a B on the honors chemistry final, putting him too far behind the captain of the chess team to catch up by the end of the semester? Our expectations should be high, but we should still cut some slack if they do not meet them. Maybe we should not even let them know exactly how high those expectations are for fear of them failing us and building more issues for them to deal with in their adult life. My father learned real quickly that I was not going to be the quarterback of the family.
Leave a Comment
February 9, 2009 at 12:56 (Becoming an EC-4 Teacher in Texas, Child Development, Uncategorized)
Tags: Becoming an EC-4 Teacher in Texas, category, child, child directed, classroom, cognitive preferences, community, considering, development, education, effective instruction, factors, guest speakers, human, impact learning, individual learning style, influence, instruction, integrating curriculum, knowledge, learning exploration, learning outside of learning, lesson plan, middle school, modalities, multiple intelligences, new england, organization, organizational skills, parenting styles, personality type, personality types, recognizing your own style, resource, schema, student centered, teacher, teacher centered, texas, thought, using the community as a resource
(summary, thoughts, and review of Becoming an EC-4 Teacher in Texas by Janice L. Nath and Myrna Cohen)

Becoming an EC-4 Teacher in Texas
Chapter 6 : Considering a Range of Factors That Impact Learning
By David Roy
This chapter seemed to go all over the place in the beginning. It brought up organization in a nontraditional sense than I was accustomed. It talked about parenting styles, which would have fit later when the text synched into a coherent flow about individual learning styles. Unfortunately, she sandwiches “using the community as a resource” between them.
I understand why, but do not agree with her use of the word “organize” in the first part of the segment titled, “Organizational Skills.” The title alone makes me think of a conscious decision to have things be put into order; however, she uses it as a faculty of setting up an action for a result like the child who drops things from his crib to see how many times someone picks it up. Then, she changes her meaning of the word to fit putting things into a category or schema. The chapter was still not very focused at this point.
I agree with the using community as a resource. Sometimes this can be tricky in a school district. If it were up to me, we would go on field trips once a week to some notable place in the community. There would be guest speakers in the classroom once a month. Even vice versa would be good. In a New England middle school they learn about the Revolutionary War, colonization, and early America. A clause in the parent handbook states that teachers could take a classroom of students by foot almost anywhere around town (it was not very big). There was a world of relevant history waiting at their doorsteps, literally. To my disappointment none of them took advantage of that. I understand the cost involved in busing kids across town. I also understand the difficulty of signing their other teachers on board to a day out of the classroom. We talk all of this jive about integrating curriculum, but how often is that really done? Probably not as often as it should be.
I would have left the aforementioned out of this chapter, which actually dealt with the different factors of learning outside of learning. The parenting styles combined with personality types, multiple intelligences, cognitive preferences, and other modalities was the meat and potatoes of this chapter. Teaching to these styles and recognizing your own style fits with these accordingly. I guess you tell me I am a brazen orange with a green and blue rising. Maybe we should be conscious of horoscope charts for all of our kids while we are at it. This is less sarcastic than it comes across. There are many factors in this world that affect us. I have my own take on the world that was handed down by my influences. They will also. As a teacher I will try to round my students to enjoy and benefit from all learning styles.
My take on surveys to reveal your personality is that I never think there are enough choices for me to choose. This does not mean that I see others fitting neatly into the little box these tests have created for them. I will have kids that fit into those boxes also. What do we do when they do not? Then, the real challenge begins. Part of our job is showing them all the different hats they can wear. Another part of our job is to show the effectiveness of each hat. We have to know the styles to teach in them, right?
When they explored the different teaching styles I got a chuckle at the mention of the preferred teaching style of Texas, student centered teaching. I do not know about your classrooms, but I have never had a student ask for a standardized test. Nath defines it as, “Teachers continuously ask whether children are able, ready for, and interested in the instruction that will be implemented.” She makes the distinction between the Montessori style, which is purely student centered, and the child directed with reference to the curriculum. I think our public schools are more Learning/Student centered like the details in table 6.4 if not a blend of a little autocracy from the teacher centered. I hear that some districts have specified worksheets and detailed lesson plans for teachers to follow without deviation. Does that mean we should add another category to that table – state guideline centered. How does government centered sound?
Leave a Comment
February 9, 2009 at 06:59 (Becoming an EC-4 Teacher in Texas, Child Development, Uncategorized)
Tags: accommodation, assimilation, Becoming an EC-4 Teacher in Texas, behaviorist, biologist, brain, building toward a goal, call and response, category, cause and effect, change, child, classroom, cognitive, cognitive learning, cognitivists, conditional knowledge, conditioning, constructivists, contiguity, conundrum, declarative knowledge, development, education, effective instruction, experience, how do we learn, human, humanity, input, input and response, instruction, internal mental process, internal mental structure, jargon, knowledge, layering, level, long term memory, metacognition, negative reinforcement, observable behavior, operant conditioning, pavlov, philosophers, positive reinforcement, presentation punishment, procedural knowledge, promote, punishment, reinforcement, removal punishment, repetition, research, response, rid, rote memory, scaffolding, schema, scientists, sensory memory, short term memory, stimulus, teacher, texas, what is learning, working memory
(summary, thoughts, and review of Becoming an EC-4 Teacher in Texas by Janice L. Nath and Myrna Cohen)

Becoming an EC-4 Teacher in Texas
Chapter 5 : Using Learning Theories and Processes
By David Roy
The ultimate question a teacher should at some time in their career, hopefully early in it, is “How do we learn?” Many research scientists and philosophers have been examining this conundrum throughout the ages. Thankfully, biologists studying the brain have some answers for us, which are not too far from where we were looking. These people have brought the jargon we need to adequately describe those aspects humanity did not have words to express.
To answer our question one must first answer the question of what actually is learning. Behaviorists define learning as “a change in observable behavior as a result of experience.” Cognitive learning theorists disagree with the Behaviorists. They say it is “when there is a change in the person’s internal mental structures or processes.” Behaviorists operate on base input and response situations like that of which we might observe in animals. Cognitive theorists include much more elaborate situations of building toward a goal.
Rote memory of the multiplication tables, cause and effect repetitions, and call and response are example of what Behaviorists call contiguity. It seems that contiguity is a trend in the Behaviorist styles of learning. Pavlov and his salivating dogs were conditioned for a specific response when the bell rang. Is that learning? By both definitions it would be, but the focus on the behavior rather than the cognitive process puts it into the behaviorist category. Reinforcement in positive and negative forms and punishment are considered conditioning as well. Instead of the classical view this type of conditioning is called Operant Conditioning. Reinforcement always promotes a behavior. Punishment is always to get rid of an unwanted one. Like reinforcement there are two types of punishment. Presentation punishment is when a child gets something to stop the behavior like a reprimand or a bad mark. Removal punishment is when something is taken away.
Unlike the Behaviorists, Cognitists (I just made that up) use layering of stimulus to teach. They are more concerned with knowledge rather than behavior. They define three types of memory to build upon. The first, sensory memory lasts less than a second. These are unimportant bits that our mind catches every day and then discards. Imagine if you could remember every color of every outfit every teacher you have ever had wore. I think I know a guy like that. He gets a crazy check from the government every month. Sometimes when we talk he brings up bits of dialogue I might have said to him seven years ago. He recites it to me verbatim word for word. When he asks if I remember I tell him I do not, but it sounds like something I would say. Actually, he is probably in the extremely developed stages of working memory, which last for as long as is needed in the task at hand or about twenty seconds. Without rehearsal or chunking the memory would be long gone unless you are in my friend’s case. With practice it becomes long-term memory. Long-term memory can still be lost if it is not continuously stroked.
Constructivists agree with the Cognitists in their definition; however, they add that the mental process must be observable. They give us words like assimilation and accommodation. Assimilation is taking information and placing it into already learned schema. Accommodation is the realization that the experience might not fit within the assimilated schema and so develops a new category for it.
Once information is learned there are different ways it can be expressed. Declarative knowledge refers to the basic type of fact knowledge that people know. Procedural knowledge is the application of declarative knowledge in a situation. It is simply knowing how to do something. Conditional knowledge is knowing when to do it. All of this metacognition, thinking about thinking, is making me hungry.
Leave a Comment
« Older entries